Dog Bite

Fall From Tree
$2.3M
Balcony Fall
$1.75M
Trip & Fall
$1.75M
Scaffolding Fall
$2.25M
Dog-bite-danger

In California, dog bite incidents are governed by a specific set of statutes that form a crucial part of premises liability law. With a high number of pet ownership, understanding dog bite laws becomes essential for both dog owners and potential victims. California adopts a “strict liability” approach for dog bites, making it unique compared to some other jurisdictions which may follow the “one-bite rule.”

California's Strict Liability Approach

Under California’s Civil Code 3342, the state adheres to a strict liability framework when it comes to dog bites. This means that a dog owner is automatically liable for injuries caused by their dog biting someone, provided the victim was in a public place or lawfully in a private place (including the property of the dog owner). This holds true regardless of the dog’s past behavior – even if the dog has never shown any signs of aggression or has never bitten anyone before.

What’s crucial to understand is that there is no “free bite” in California. Unlike the “one-bite rule” where the owner might be exempt from liability if they were unaware of their dog’s aggressive tendencies, California’s strict liability ensures that victims have a clearer path to compensation.

Exceptions and Exclusions

While the strict liability approach offers broad protection, there are certain exceptions:

  • Trespassers: The law explicitly mentions that the victim should be in a public place or lawfully in a private place. This means that a trespasser bitten by a dog might not have grounds to claim damages under this statute.
  • Provocation: If it’s proven that the victim provoked the dog – for instance, by teasing or tormenting it – the owner’s liability might be reduced.
  • Professional Responsibility: Individuals who professionally handle dogs, like veterinarians or dog groomers, might not be covered under this provision since they assume a certain level of risk in their profession.

Premises Liability and Homeowners

The interplay between dog bite laws and premises liability is particularly relevant for homeowners. Homeowners might face legal claims if a guest, service person, or even a trespasser (in some circumstances) is bitten by their dog on their property. Given the strict liability provision, homeowners can find themselves facing significant financial repercussions.

Dog-biting-on-leash
Get a Free Case Evaluation
Dog-biting-pant-leg

Homeowner's Insurance and Dog Bites

A significant aspect of dog bite incidents is its relation to homeowner’s insurance. Many insurance policies provide coverage for dog bite incidents, meaning they will cover the legal fees and potential settlement costs up to the policy’s limits. However, there are challenges:

  • Breed Restrictions: Some insurance policies exclude specific breeds deemed “high-risk” for aggression. Owners of these breeds might find themselves without coverage unless they’ve secured a specific endorsement.
  • Premium Increases: A dog bite claim can lead to increased insurance premiums for the homeowner.
  • Coverage Caps: Insurance policies will have a coverage limit. If the damages exceed this limit, the homeowner might be personally liable for the remainder.

Taking Legal Action

California’s approach to dog bite laws within the framework of premises liability offers a robust mechanism for victims to seek compensation. While it provides a more straightforward route for those injured, it also underscores the responsibilities dog owners have, especially homeowners. Given the potential ramifications of a dog bite incident – both in terms of victim injury and financial repercussions for the owner – understanding these laws is essential. If you’ve been involved in a dog bite incident, contact Rafii Law today to schedule a consultation.

Contact Us

    Get a Free Case Evaluation
    Google Rating
    4.8
    Based on 288 reviews
    js_loader